The Piltdown Hoax began when Charles Dawson received a fraction of a scull said to be found at the Piltdown Gravel pit in East Sussex, England in December of 1912. He and Arthur Smith Woodward began to uncover the site but Dawson only found more pieces on his own. The scull found had most pieces including a jaw bone, it seemed to be very similar to a human scull but with several differences, it was thought to be the missing link between humans and apes. This find was accepted easily by the public, and though somewhat questioned by the scientific community, Dawsons respected reputation caused very few, if no one to straight up question it. Therefore it stood, the answer to the question of the missing link. For forty years it stood as the answer, until, after Dawsons death, when others were finally able to see the evidence up close and it was discovered that the find was really a combination of a human scull from the medieval era, the jaw of an orangutang and some fossilized ape teeth, all that had been stained to match, and the teeth had been shaped to fit. In other words, it was a false, a hoax, created to bring fame to Dawsons name, or for the country of England. In this case mans desire for glory or recognition got in the way of true science and set the community forty years back. However what was learned from this hoax is invaluable. It is now widely understood how critical it is to have peer evaluation and feedback, and to not take anything at face value, no matter the name behind it. So even though we can not remove man from the picture, we can lessen the margin for error by checking and rechecking against peer information. Something we can all learn from this scam is to never just swallow what people are telling us, but to research for ourselves. Especially in this era of information overload.
I agree with what you said that we could learn from the Piltdown Hoax that to never swallow what people are telling us, but to research for ourselves. I think this is how we learn, but looking for information ourselves and not by what people tell us. Just like everything, we learn from out mistakes so hopefully many scientists learned from the Piltdown Hoax
ReplyDeleteA couple of questions:
ReplyDeleteSpecifically, why was this fossil find thought to be the missing link between human and ape?
What scientific technology allowed scientists to uncover the fraud?
Would you want to get rid of the human factor in science?
The basics are covered and your synopsis is good. I would have liked a little more exploration in to these questions.
I agree with you in the fact that peer evaluation and feedback is very important. In many cases this can help us to reevaluate our findings, analysis and even proposed solutions to any kind of problem. That is one of the good things of science that many scientist can go to the same analysis and date and it will be expected they get the same result.
ReplyDeleteI liked your argument and your life lesson because it is important to make sure we don't automatically believe what everyone tells us because not everything people say is true, for reference, The Piltdown Hoax.
ReplyDeleteI definitely agree with your post. Most people agree with what they hear without getting proof. If the person who is providing the information is more reliable and or educated we are more likely to just agree with what they say rather than researching to see if the facts are real or not.
ReplyDelete